Bush Flip Flop, or caught in a lie?

Sometimes I wonder which is worse - the hipocrisy and lies or the deed itself. All hail the omnipotent King of Democracy!

What has GB said about wiretaps:

April 19, 2004 - Hershey, Pennsylvania:
"You see, what that meant is if you got a wiretap by court order -- and by the way, everything you hear about requires court order, requires there to be permission from a FISA court, for example."

April 20, 2004 - Buffalo, New York:
"Any time you hear the United States government talking about wiretap, it requires -- a wiretap requires a court order. Nothing has changed, by the way. When we're talking about chasing down terrorists, we're talking about getting a court order before we do so."

July 14, 2004 - Fond Du Lac, WI:
"A couple of things that are very important for you to understand about the Patriot Act. First of all, any action that takes place by law enforcement requires a court order. In other words, the government can't move on wiretaps or roving wiretaps without getting a court order. What the Patriot Act said is let's give our law enforcement the tools necessary, without abridging the Constitution of the United States, the tools necessary to defend America."

December 19, 2005 - Public Speech:
To those who pointed out Bush's hipocrisy, the outing was a "shameful act" that anyone would expose Bush's lie. Of course, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales came to his defense, as did Vice President Dick Cheney. Where's Karl Rove?